Honorable Kelly…Sir, there are mandatory sentencing guidelines for a very good reason. I’m afraid that you failed the people of the State of California but, more importantly the innocent child victims when you lessened the convicted baby raper’s sentence by 15 years. I’m not sure where you came up with the idea that the predator didn’t intend malice against the little girl that he assaulted. Basically, what you are saying is that if an innocent, young, and defensless child happens to wander into a room where an adult is, it’s ok to assault the child because the adult didn’t go out looking for her? Hogwash! Nobody has the right to sexually or physically assault a child. I don’t care if the child wandered in there butt naked. Anyone who sexually assaults a child under any circumstances is a predator, and a pedophile. This isn’t rocket science. A child was hurt, and traumatized by this adult. Your judgement failed you in this case, Sir! And you have failed the innocent children who now must deal with this pedophile much sooner than the voters, and law makers in our great state ever intended to. Judge Kelly, I regret to inform you that you have made our unfortunate list of “failed Justices”, and we hang our heads in sorrow at the favor you have shown the child rapist. It’s too bad you are not on the side of the young, innocent, and defenseless. They needed you in their corner to demonstrate the valor, and protection you could’ve given them. This Californian is happy she lives in Riverside County, and not Orange County.